Roji Intel Blog

Dave Halpert 0
0
AttributionPQRS ReportingValue-Based Payment Modifier
May 26, 2015

Provider Network Growth? How to Avoid Unanticipated Medicare VBPM Penalties

Mergers and acquisitions, joint ventures and affiliations—this is the new face of health care, and the trend shows no signs of slackening. If your group has grown and changed significantly through consolidation, you’d best take a second look at your 2013 Quality and Resource Use Report (QRUR). Chances are, it no longer applies to your organization, putting your at risk for significant penalties under the Value-Based Payment Modifier (VBPM). The good news is that CMS has released its Mid-Year 2014 QRURs to all providers, regardless of how many providers are billed under your group’s Tax Identification Number (TIN). Why bother…
Read More
Dave Halpert 0
0
AttributionPQRS ReportingQualified Clinical Data Registry ReportingValue-Based Payment Modifier
May 5, 2015

Who Else Cares for Your Patients? How the Wrong Patient Attribution Can Skew Your VBPM

So, exactly who are your patients? Sounds like a silly question. But when it comes to Medicare’s patient attribution methodology, the answer is not obvious. Medicare attributes patients to providers and practices in order to calculate components of the Value-Based Payment Modifier (VBPM). Like it or not, certain patients can be attributed to your practice, even if their conditions are not under your clinical management, skewing your VBPM. If you don’t understand the rules, you risk significant penalties. This is true for all providers, but most apparent in specialty groups. As a Qualified Registry and QCDR that reports all measures…
Read More
Dave Halpert 0
0
Population HealthPQRS ReportingQualified Clinical Data Registry ReportingRegistry ScienceResearchValue-Based Payment Modifier
April 28, 2015

Better Hypertension and Diabetes Outcomes: From Basic Measurement to a Plan for Improvement

Are you caught in a squeeze between avoiding penalties in both PQRS and the Value-Based Payment Modifier (VBPM)? Medicare’s move to Pay for Performance has created a Catch-22 for many groups:  you may have enough data to report enough PQRS measures, but if you choose to report measures where your performance is below the CMS mean of your peers, you risk penalties under the VBPM. As a CMS reporting registry that integrates VBPM Consultation Services, we commonly find at least one or two measures per client with scores that could negatively affect the VBPM if used in PQRS reporting—especially for…
Read More
Dave Halpert 0
0
Population HealthPQRS ReportingQualified Clinical Data Registry ReportingValue-Based Payment Modifier
April 21, 2015

Your VBPM Incentive Payment Could Be Higher Than You Expect—If You Act Now

Here’s a lesson in budget neutrality, Medicare style: If you are penalized under PQRS for non-reporting or under the Value-Based Payment Modifier (VBPM) for poor performance, your money will be paid out to providers earning a VBPM incentive. That’s right—to your competition. If you’re on the losing end of this equation, you could lose up to 4 percent of your Medicare Revenues.  But if you’re on the winning side, you may be rewarded with a much higher net gain than an additional 4 percent. The Basic Arithmetic of PQRS and the VBPM The law creating the VBPM requires it to…
Read More
Dave Halpert 0
0
Population HealthPQRS ReportingQualified Clinical Data Registry ReportingValue-Based Payment Modifier
April 14, 2015

How to Organize Your Academic Medical Center for PQRS 2015 Success

Take a deep breath. The last-minute flurry of adjustments and updates to last year’s PQRS reporting is over. And—brace yourselves. It’s time to dig into PQRS 2015, which, if you’ve been following our posts, requires a whole new level of rigor to avoid penalties under Pay for Performance. (Download our free eBook, Insider’s Guide to PQRS 2015 Reporting, if you need to catch up.) Nowhere are the new reporting complexities greater than for Academic Medical Centers (AMCs).  Everyone is scrambling to ensure that workflow adjustments sync with new reporting requirements and general measure changes, but AMCs must contend with additional…
Read More
Dave Halpert 0
0
Population HealthPQRS ReportingQualified Clinical Data Registry ReportingValue-Based Payment Modifier
March 31, 2015

ACO v Group Practice P4P: How Medicare Costs and Quality Calculations Affect Your Bottom Line

Now that Value-Based Health Care defines the landscape, reporting for revenue is on its way out. Value-based quality is in. Medicare’s transition to Pay for Performance gives providers just three options—and no out—for participating in reimbursement models that reward for higher quality and lower cost: Build or participate in an Accountable Care Organization; Report PQRS and submit to the risk of the practice-based Value-Based Payment Modifier; Receive automatic financial penalties. Given that the last option is not really viable, which way should providers participate in Medicare’s Value-Based Health Care? An Accountable Care Organization (ACO) is a network-based model for managing…
Read More
Dave Halpert 0
0
PQRS ReportingQualified Clinical Data Registry ReportingValue-Based Payment Modifier
February 3, 2015

PQRS Catch-22 for Specialists: How Medicare’s Division of Measures Can Put You at Risk for Penalties

If you are a specialist, maintaining your Medicare revenues just became more challenging. As of 2015, CMS now requires nine measures instead of three for PQRS reporting. They provided a partial reprieve by reducing the completion rate from 80 percent to only 50 percent. However, successful PQRS reporting is all or nothing—failure to report all nine measures within three domains will result in a penalty for both PQRS and the Value-Based Payment Modifier (VBPM) of 6 percent total in 2017. With more than 200 measures to choose from, you may wonder what’s the problem; surely you can find nine that…
Read More
Dave Halpert 0
0
Population HealthPQRS ReportingQualified Clinical Data Registry ReportingRegistry ScienceValue-Based Payment Modifier
January 20, 2015

Avoid PQRS and VBPM Penalties and Achieve Long Term Revenues: How to Choose the Right QCDR

Can you optimize your Value-Based Payment Modifier (VBPM) quality and cost profile to demonstrate better outcomes than others and avoid both PQRS and VBPM penalties at the same time? Yes: Use a Qualified Clinical Data Registry (QCDR) to do both. In 2014, the initial year of QCDR reporting, providers had the opportunity to report non-PQRS measures, but still get credit for participating in PQRS. This year, Medicare has provided additional freedom by giving QCDRs the chance to report 30 non-PQRS measures for PQRS, up from last year’s 20. Providers are required to report an additional outcome measure this year (two,…
Read More
Dave Halpert 0
0
PQRS ReportingQualified Clinical Data Registry ReportingValue-Based Payment Modifier
January 6, 2015

Medicare Is Playing by 2015 Rules—Are You?

Does it feel like 2015 yet? While we may fill out paperwork that reads “2014 2015” for the next few weeks, 2015 is here—and it’s different. Do you need evidence? The 2015 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule is officially in effect.  Several hundred pages within the 1200-page “Final Rule” describe the rules for the 2015 Physician Quality Reporting System (PQRS) and the 2017 Value-Based Payment Modifier (VBPM). Make no mistake—there is no transition period; these rules are in place today whether you’re ready or not. So, now that we’re playing by 2015 rules, what do you need to know? PQRS 2015 Is…
Read More
Dave Halpert 0
0
PQRS ReportingQualified Clinical Data Registry ReportingValue-Based Payment Modifier
December 30, 2014

New Year’s Resolution: Know the Difference Between PQRS and Meaningful Use

No one wants another CMS penalty letter this coming year. Especially after the past two weeks, when many providers from coast to coast learned that their Medicare Part B reimbursements in 2015 will be cut by 1.5 percent, since they were eligible but did not participate in PQRS 2013. Caught by surprise, some providers were shocked to discover that their successful participation in Meaningful Use (MU) did not fulfill PQRS requirements—and they were hit with the penalty. It certainly pays to understand the difference between these two Medicare initiatives. Both MU and PQRS are intended to improve the level of care…
Read More